US SOCCER NEEDS LEADERS
RECAPS
PREVIEWS
EXTRA TIME
BRENT LATHAM - Friday, October 9, 2009
If it has taken me some time to come up with some sort of reaction to the American disaster that was the Under-20 World Cup in Egypt, maybe it's because there were so many levels of failure to sort through in order to get to the crux of the issue.

In a tournament in which many top teams left their best players home, and FIFA ups the participation of underrepresented confederations, distorting the level of competition significantly, perhaps the most telling measure of the difficulty of getting to second round was that the Americans in the end were just one goal away from seizing the last spot, despite their poor showing.

That is, it's not hard to advance at the U-20 World Cup. Despite all that, Thomas Rongen's side still managed to crash out in the first round, along with the likes of Uzbekistan and Tahiti. There are some sound excuses that begin to explain the failure - Rongen repeatedly mentioned the paucity of opportunity and playing time for the best Americans at this level Ė and those problems need to be evaluated in depth.

But, truth be told, there's no reason a team of Americans playing at any level should not be able to do much, much better in this tournament. Just look at the teams still playing as the tournament enters the quarterfinals. Do South Korea, Hungary, or the United Arab Emirates really have so much more youth talent than the US?

The short answer is no, they don't. Despite the ease and ferocity with which this group of American Under-20 players was torn apart, both on the field and in the media, the fact remains that this team was pretty decent in terms of talent and ability. Brek Shea, Dilly Duka, Ike Opara, and company, might not be at the top of the future Premier League stars list, but this was group that had as much potential as previous US teams, and their opponents, and still managed to dreadfully underperform.

So despite the cries to the contrary by the sky-is-falling crew that appears every time something goes wrong with US Soccer, this performance really has little bearing on its future.

This team, like any youth squad, comes from a very small sample of the US player pool, and these 21 players will never be called on as anything to close to a group again. This cycle has also already produced two pretty good players in Freddy Adu and Jozy Altidore, pretty much accounting for enough talent from a two-year period for the time being.

Furthermore, the results of Under-20 teams at youth World Cups have seldom been an arbiter of future performance on the full national team level, and if history is a guide, which it is, only a few of those on this year's team will ever see the field for the full grown national team.

But those are also good reasons for the US to do well, instead of poorly. And this team, like many before it, flunked when it could have outperformed.

But if the Americans didn't lack talent vis a vis the field, where did they come up short?

Part of the problem was attitude. Unfortunately this is not the first time we've seen a disorganized and clueless American team take the field when it needs to, and should, play better. Despite everything, a scoreless second half against Korea would have resulted in qualification. Coach Rongen should have had a good sense of what his team needed to get through, but instead he opted for a disgustingly pessimistic and ineffective long ball strategy that played further into the Koreans' hands for 45 anger-inducing minutes.

No surprise there, though. We've seen it all before. These sorts of performances are becoming common throughout the American program.

And that comes down to leadership. The Germans and Koreans had it, and the Americans did not. The US continues to produce talent, but putting all the pieces on the field in the proper order, and getting those players to implement a coherent and effective strategy, and believe they can win consistently at a high level, still seems an impossible task in US Soccer.

That process starts and ends with the coach. Who was that South Korean coach? None other than Myung Bo Hong, a defender who led Korea in three World Cups, including their semi-final run in 2002. The guy knows something about winning that Rongen seems not to. Which makes me think an ex-player like Alexi Lalas or Marcelo Balboa, or even future retirees like Brian MicBride or Frankie Hejduk would be great for the youth program.

These young guys need a positive winner as a role model. In pre-tournament interviews, the players told me time and time again that they believed, despite the general perception that the team was outmanned, that they could go far in Egypt and maybe even win it all.

That's what you want a team to believe. And based on the other teams I saw play in Egypt, few of which looked too impressive, I think those players were right to be confident.

The coach, on the other hand, was one of the team's biggest detractors. Rongen began with the excuses before the tournament even began, and actually said in a press conference after the resounding 4-1 over Cameroon that his team wasn't good enough to win the tournament, and just making the next round was his goal.

Clearly that negativity spilled over into the team, which should have played with confidence against South Korea, but did no such thing. In fact, in what seemed a concerted effort to undermine the team's confidence from the beginning, Rongen sent out a decidedly unprepared lineup and under-experienced lineup to face Germany, and they were run off the field. When he chose what seemed more like a first choice lineup against Cameroon, things worked better.

But with the Americans needing a simple result in the matchup against South Korea, one that should have been pretty even, Rongen and his team were embarrassed again from the opening whistle by a more focused, determined, and organized opponent.

South Korea was everything the Americans weren't. The Asian coach, when asked about the victory, didn't speak about talent, or skill, but rather his squad's superior determination and will power. Those are things Americans used to have in spades, but seem to have lost under the current leadership.

Maybe Rongen was just being an honest Dutchman as he explained repeatedly before, during, and after the tournament why his team would be, was, and had been no good. But judging on the soccer still being played here in Egypt as the semifinals approach, there's no reason to think this group of Americans, with a little more organization and preparation, couldn't have been involved deep into the tournament.

Since Rongen is a perfect example of why it is a fruitless debate, I'm not going to get involved in the foreign coach versus American coach argument.

What US Soccer needs on the sidelines are winners, no matter where they come from - leaders that understand and can break down the individual battles that take place in the tournaments that mean most, and can put the best team on the field in each match to assure that most of those battles are won, and at the end of the day, the resources available are fully utilized.

It's not a matter of American versus foreigner. Bruce Arena was the best we've ever had at the matchup game. Still it must be conceded that, in soccer, there are more European and South American winners than there are American.

Cycles differ, but the US has the talent at every age level to compete much more than the team did here in Egypt. As a soccer nation, we need to improve our showings, and win, sooner rather than later, some of these tournaments. Until we do, these underperformances will keep filtering up to the full national team, leaving a trail of failure in their wake.

Perhaps the talented U-17 group about to take the field in Nigeria will take the first step. Wilmer Cabrera is an untested coach who is something of an experiment in US Soccer in that he comes from outside the normal power structure. Maybe the Colombian can provide a model for success in the wake of this U-20 debacle.

He certainly won't have to do too much to top the Americans' performance here in Egypt.
Wayne C.
Monday October 12, 2009 5:41 pm
I agree somewhat about the deficiency or lack of leadership. I'll have to disagree with the notion that we have the talent to succeed at this level or maybe we haven't attained the consistency needed (which might explain the win over Cameroon). For me, the match against Germany was the telling story. We were completely outmatched and outclassed at this level by a German team that can serve as a benchmark for our progress as a soccer nation. Our skill level and playing savvy is just not there. Many of the US players still have a first touch like stone, dribble themselves headlong into trouble or make passes which indicate they have no concept of passing, space, vision or strategy. Quite frankly, I think player development in this country has plateaued. Until our kids start playing and treating this game as a passion and not just an organized activity, we will continue to crank out more mediocre players and produce more showings such as this.
Goalscorer24
Saturday October 10, 2009 11:51 am
There is no doubt the US has the talent. Now it is a coaching issue. When you have coaches that have never played at a high level or been to a World Cup themselves as a player you can't get very far. What experiences will they draw on to motivate their players?
Martell T
Saturday October 10, 2009 10:44 am
I couldn't had said better myself. We need new blood in our system, we should start looking at players that have spent most or an important part of their careers (Reyna, Sanneh, McBride). Just hiring an avarage MLS-Joe isn't going to fix the problem since they don't have experience at the highest level.
The problem with most of our coaches is that they're still in a pre-1994 mentality. They were coaches at the college level first and never left the country, if they did it was for a very limited time. They've never played at the highest level, they have been coached by world class coaches, they don't know the day-to-day things that mantain a high level. They don't understand or care for sophisisticated tactics, they don't play the best players unless they fit the old style (big, fast and strong).
The Union Jack
Friday October 9, 2009 8:41 pm
"Part of the problem was attitude. Unfortunately this is not the first time we've seen a disorganized and clueless American team take the field when it needs to, and should, play better....These sorts of performances are becoming common throughout the American program" Spot on Brent. But this is the reason we need some "sky-is-falling crew". I am not agreeing that the bottom has dropped out of US Soccer. But I see no reason, as a passionate supporter of all National Teams, to not expect better and be mad when it is lack of focus and determination that play a big part in the failure.

I am a big Philadelphia sports fan and can't wait until the Union joins the MLS. As a sports group we are very much maligned (in some cases justified) but in our core we expect our teams, players and coaches to leave it on the field every time they play ESPECIALLY if they can do better. If US Soccer and the National Teams want my support I want them to bring the right attitude and confidence every time. The program is also at an age where we should no longer except an 'aw shucks, we played good, guess we get 'em next time'. If we want to be taken serious around the world at this game we need to take ourselves serious not allow a less than serious attitude during every game. Tomorrow in Honduras and Wednesday in RFK are critical. If the right attitude is not present in either or both of these games, the US may not be present in South Africa.

The Union Jack
Jose
Friday October 9, 2009 8:13 pm
i assume that When you said native american must be for people who born here, so you only said native american ,,them you are referred to the Navajos, Cherokee, Apache? and is Colombian not Columbian
Tom Adams
Friday October 9, 2009 4:26 pm
Sorry to see you shied away from this one "... I'm not going to get involved in the foreign coach versus American coach argument." ... I'm a believer in that it's pretty hard to intimidate an American, at least a native born American. This gets us in a lot of trouble in foreign affairs, but it a great asset when your football talent doesn't match up. If you tap into that element at the core of most Americans you can create a team synergy where the whole (team performance) is greater than the sum of the individual parts (player skill & talent). Thatís how you beat Portugal. We need coaches that understand that Ė Maybe the Columbian Wilmer Cabrera can do that. But, I doubt it. Itís not in his genes. - Tom Adams
David
Friday October 9, 2009 3:23 pm
I know Rongen had a good showing last time around with the likes of Altidore, Bradley, and Adu in the team, but we need some fresh ideas at the U20 level.

Let's not forget it was his snub of Subotic that nudged him to opt for Serbia over the US, so that's 2 fairly large failures on his part that could have a serious impact on the future of the US team.

With our luck, we'll play Serbia in the Cup next year and Subotic will score on a corner to knock us out.
Mark
Friday October 9, 2009 2:51 pm
The USA lacks management that can win on the big stage. I think it time to get managers and coaches that can win on the world stage regardless of their nationality. To build a program in this country we talent that can fill in the blanks and teach us the skills. We also need the winning experience. Why does so much of our talent leave to play in Europe? Winning has to be learned in the presence of winners. We need winners here.
Volker
Friday October 9, 2009 1:36 pm
maybe the american federation needs to do what the DFB did, pair a great motivator and meat shield (Klinsmann) with a (more or less) good coach (Loew). The motivator/shield will help the players to find the right mindset and will shield the coach from all the criticism so he can work in peace.
Chuck
Friday October 9, 2009 1:08 pm
Part of the problem is the comment posted by Tom, I do not care what England did, I do care about the USA and the way they did it. We as fans of the game need to demand more from our orgainzation (USSF) and the coach for all the US teams. If US women's teams can be successful in the world of soccer with less support than the Men's teams get then there is NO excuse that is worth listening to from the coaches and the organization.

The other issue I see is that US players while talented generally are not subject to promotion and relegation battles that the players in other countries are subjected to, so when the time to dig deep and step come the US player generally is not able to do so.
Page 1 of 2
1 2  Next »
ADD YOUR COMMENTS
Name


Email (will not appear on the site)


Comment


Join the YA Email Alert?

Comments are moderated and will be posted if they are on-topic and free of profanity, abuse and spam. HTML and links are not allowed.

SUBMIT COMMENT

The next test for the Dooley-led revitalization of the Philippine national team kicks off soon.
RECENT POSTS
Mjondalen near Tippeligaen
USMNT ratings vs Colombia
O'Brien nears Neustadt debut
Europa qualification rolls on