Which player had the best season in the European leagues for 2017-18?
Matt Miazga
Weston McKennie
Andrija Novakovich
Kenny Saief
Christian Pulisic
Timmy Chandler
Theoson-Jordan Siebatcheu
BRIAN SCIARETTA - Wednesday, December 23, 2009
This past week it became news that US Soccer would retain Thomas Rongen as the head coach of the USA U20 national team for the 2011 World Cup cycle. It will be Rongen's third straight cycle as head coach of the U20 team and fourth overall.

Despite his weaknesses and the disappointing results of the 2009 U20 team at the World Cup this year, Rongen remains the right person for the job for this cycle. There are several reasons for this.

The first reason is that Rongen remains an offensive minded coach that has always attempted to build his midfield around creative players. More importantly, Rongen provides room in his system for these creative players to use their individual talents and skills to dictate the pace of the games.

In the 2003 cycle, Rongen built his team around the playmaking of Bobby Convey and Justin Mapp. The result was the best soccer the US has ever played at the U20 age group. The US posted convincing wins over Paraguay, the Ivory Coast and South Korea before falling 2-1 in extra time to Argentina in an end-to-end thriller.

In the 2007 cycle, the team's playmaking was even more explosive. The midfield was centered on Freddy Adu but he was aided by Robbie Rogers, Sal Zizzo, Michael Bradley and Danny Szetela, all of whom excelled in the system. The team managed wins over Poland, Brazil, and Uruguay before falling to Austria in extra-time.

While the 2009 cycle was disappointing for the US, the system was still built around attacking soccer. The best field players on the team were Dilly Duka, Bryan Arguez, and Jared Jeffery. Rongen's system did provide for a player like Duka to use his creativity to manufacture offense. Still, it remains a distinct possibility that this team's poor results may just have been a result of it being less talented than the three previous U20 classes.

Far too often, youth soccer coaches in the US are accused of playing a very robotic or rigid form of the game that stifles creativity and individual skill. Many American youth teams lack playmaking in favor of bunkering and long ball tactics. While this may be a fair generalization for most coaches in this country, Rongen does not fall into this harsh stereotype.

The backbone of Rongen's system is simply freedom on the field for talented playmaking midfielders. The success and failure of his teams will depend solely on a player's talent and vision. Rongen will allow his players, not his system, to determine how far the team goes.

At the youth level, this type of system is the right one. While results are important, an even bigger priority should be to allow the players to play in front of scouts and show off their talents. A less rigid system like the one Rongen uses will truly show where the American talent stands compared to the rest of the world at this particular age group.

While the 2009 suffered from a lack of explosive players that Rongen needs, the players in the 2011 cycle will not have this problem. The only thing that can drain talent to render Rongen's system ineffective would be if the players elect not to participate because they are beyond youth soccer (similar to how Jozy Altidore and Freddy Adu declined to play in the 2009 U20 World Cup despite being age-eligible).

While other young players will emerge in over the course of the cycle, right now the team will have players like Luis Gil, Sebastian Lleget and Carlos Martinez running the offense. These type of players should do exceptionally well under Rongen's system because they will be given the freedom to use their creativity.

Another major reason why Rongen is still a good coach at this age group is his inclination to search far and wide for players that will thrive in his teams. For example, over the 2009 cycle, Rongen called in 113 different players and several of these players developed in unique ways. In the cases of Mix Diskerud and Giuseppe Nazzani (who was called into several camps but didn't make the final team), the players never even seriously played organized soccer in the United States.

It's very important to have a U20 coach that has such a willingness to search for players that develop outside the typical routes of US Soccer youth development like The Bradenton Academy. It shows both independence from the US Soccer structure as well as acknowledges the fact that there are good players who develop their games later and through other routes.

During Rongen's tenure, there have always been players that have emerged very late in the cycle to make the World Cup teams. Gabriel Ferrari emerged just a few months before the World Cup in 2007 and there were many players that made the roster in 2009 that did not make the qualifying roster. Again, this is a good thing in that it shows an open mind by constantly looking for players during the course of the entire two year cycle.

This certainly does not mean Rongen is without his flaws. He most certainly has them. His failure to make a third substitution in the 2003 quarterfinal against Argentina allowed Javier Mascherano to equalize at the end of second half injury time and cost the US a stunning victory. In 2007, Rongen stuck with the same group of players for every game and by the quarterfinals, they were worn down. In 2009, the starting lineup in the opening game did not appear to be the best the USA had to offer given the games leading up to the World Cup in the summer.

Still, the positives outweigh the negatives in evaluating the decision to retain Rongen as head coach for the 2011 U20 cycle. This hold true especially when you consider the players he will have at his disposal this time. Rongen is a good coach of skilled players and this cycle he will certainly have an abundance of type of players that have done well under him in the past. It should certainly be an attractive brand of soccer with plenty of skill and creativity on display.
Christina M
Friday January 1, 2010 5:48 pm
I like the guy, I think he takes some risks, but that is what we need to do to develop our team. I appreciate your article!
Friday January 1, 2010 4:02 pm
The article fairly points out Rongen's weaknesses and strengths. I watched the team very closely in Canada in 07 and I agree that the team was very attacking and relied heavily on the individual midfielder talent. It was great fun to watch. 2009 was a disappointment, but I think soccer fans, more than fans of any other sport, want to lynch the coach immediately and think through the situation later (What have you done for me lately?). Maybe the talent pool was just not as strong as in 03 and 07. I also completely agree that a critical function of the U20's is to feed the pipeline into the national team. Rongen's success at this cannot be reasonably questioned. I'd like to see how he handles the next cycle before deciding to see him dumped.

Good article...and provocative. It's good to see a writer willing to get the readers' juices flowing.
Wednesday December 30, 2009 9:50 pm
What a loser mentality: Rongen consistently underperforms but we should keep him because he 1) centers his team around attacking players (wrong), and 2) calls in a lot of players (and then subsequently selects a team that gets owned by a bunch of South Korean college students).

Rongen is an embarrassment and his presence is indicative of the incredibly low expectations surrounding US Soccer. It's chronic.

He also drove away Neven Subotic. Gee, think we could use him now??

As much as I support the USMNT at every turn, it's almost as if I support the players because they have to overcome this crap. Rongen has NEVER produced with any level within US Soccer! His teams do NOT play "attacking soccer" they can't even hold possession! Sciaretta, did you even watch the last U20 WC?
Juan from L.A.
Wednesday December 30, 2009 10:59 am
Good article. I am still not a fan or Rongen though but the points made in this article are very valid. I for one was one that believes in 2007 we could had gone farther and in 2009 (although noted how weaker the team was from the 2007 group) we could had done better! Rongen is at fault. Hopefully this 2011 cycle will be it. What is expected of this group is at a minimum a quarterfinals game, if not then goodbye Rongen and thank you for the CONTINUATION of US Soccer being a second tier national team! Like Donovan noted we are tired of jsut participating its time we start winning!!
Monday December 28, 2009 12:32 am
I usually don't like to start off topic, but will on this occasion. it annoys the heck out of me to see people use the word 'myopic' in an attempt for intellectual cred on soccer boards. get off yourself. we all know you simply saw that word in another article and passed it off as if it's a normal word in your repertoire. speaking of vision, you must be BLIND if you think Rongen is a good choice. He has sucked at every job he has had here in the US, but is just part of the good ole boys club now. To say we should keep him because he values creativity is a weak point. There are plenty of coaches out there who value creativity, but can also evaluate talent and may even have some indication on their CV that they have a clue about coaching at a high level. In the end, clowns like clowns. That's why the ussf extended his contract.
Thursday December 24, 2009 1:11 pm
really, I disagree with you on this article. a good coach must know which players to use at any time of the game, and which players would be effective as a substitute. long balls were the base of this team at U20 world cup along with counter attacking which is the same tactics used by the men's national team. the only time I saw attractive attacking football was with coach cabrera, he introduced well known players.
Thursday December 24, 2009 5:33 am
Agree - this is a great article.

U-20 World Cup is all very nice, but not that important. We need a coach who can develop players, and help funnel the best into clubs and the USMNT.

I don't find Rongen to be a great choice when the point is to win, but for what his job is, he does well. Brian did well to point that out.
Wednesday December 23, 2009 8:38 pm
lletget, gil and renken will carry this team to give us the trophy
Wednesday December 23, 2009 8:34 pm
also, let us not forget how close we were to not seeing bryan arguez at all. he and gerson mayen were only brought in after injuries to other players. rongen is totally incapable and should have been ousted years ago.
Wednesday December 23, 2009 8:23 pm
that's all great but i will never be satisfied so long as rongen is in charge. whether he shows a willingness to use them or not, many players who should be used are not when they should be. there were several players left off the final squad for 2009 that should have been on it (garza, nazzani and others at hertha berlin rather than the insufferable brian ownby. also, anyone who would use tony taylor as a targetman and anyone who would use brek shea as anything but a targetman is an idiot. shea hasn't the skill to be anything else and taylor hasn't the intelligence to know when to pass the ball which is absolutely necessary for an Ibrahimovic-type player. don't say that because he likes facilitating creativity he is good for the job. i would do the same but i won't get the coaching job because i would be considered as unqualified as rongen should be.
Page 2 of 3
« Previous 1 2 3  Next »

Email (will not appear on the site)


Join the YA Email Alert?

Comments are moderated and will be posted if they are on-topic and free of profanity, abuse and spam. HTML and links are not allowed.


The final stretch of the English league season is upon us, with several Americans on the verge of relegation with their teams.
Tale of Two Young Yanks in Europe
Wagner Nears Premier League Goal
YA lineup prediction vs. T&T
vom Steeg lands at Fortuna